Connect with us
Advertise With Us

Others

Confab Report, Answer To Nigeria’s Problems – Ezeife

Published

on


BY Andrew Essien

Chief Chukwuemeka Ezeife, PhD, (CON) is a former governor of Anambra State, who later became an adviser on Political Matters to former President Olusegun Obasanjo. He was an active member of the 2014 National Conference. In this interview with Andrew Essien, the former university lecturer and retired permanent secretary speaks on sundry national issues, including economic recession, Biafran agitation and many others. Excerpts:

The issue of restructuring should unite us. There is no reason for disagreement; maybe we do not even understand. I was recently misquoted somewhere of saying that this issue of restructuring is political. Indeed, it is more economic than political. We are concerned about increase in the welfare of ordinary Nigerian people. It is not a matter of the rich. Those who are against it may be feudalists who do not care very much about the welfare of the ordinary people. What am I talking about? The present states which are not feasible are spreading hunger and suffering to ordinary Nigerians. This is because the states are too small to cater for the economic interests of their people. I was trying to explain what is called economies of scale. You don’t have it in politics but in economics. What does it say? When you have large population or space, you can produce anything at lower unit cost than when you have a very small population. Now, it is not just a matter of lower unit cost but also the capability to establish something like power in any state. For now, the capability is not there because the states are too small to afford what it takes to generate power easily. When you are dealing with water supply, power, transportation, environmental problems, it is always cheaper if you have a larger space. So, the issue is very economic and it is ordinary economics, not high-level economics. Now, the political aspect of it has to do with how to begin to create more states. Ironsi recognised 26 provinces, not states and we said he was going to make Nigeria a unitary system and killed him. Now, after killing him, they wanted to defeat Biafra in war, they started with 12 states and eventually we got to 36 states plus Abuja; and northern military men created the states to favour the north. That is why you hear some people from the north who have no conscience attacking restructuring. Indeed, the political aspect of it has been taking care of. We can negotiate. Instead of all of us suffering, lack of welfare, we can make some concessions to the north so that they can agree to restructuring properly. What is there? Only about four states can support themselves; every end of the month, we rush to Abuja to go and take oil money and we have learnt not to do anything anymore except to share oil money. I am told of some local governments where people only go to the secretariat just once in a month. When they share resources at the federal level and it gets to the local government, then the chairman calls people and say, “okay o, e don happen”, and they share the money and go away. States were created to fight Nigeria-Biafra war. After the war, subsequent military leaders from the north created states to favour their areas. That is why the north-west has seven states and Kano has by far more local governments than Lagos. Bayelsa produces oil but has only eight local governments and we are sharing money based on that. Nigerians are degenerating. Somebody opened his mouth, a big man from the north, and said, Nigerian oil is northern oil. You see what comes out of our mouth? The north and the south were always treated equal, that was why Ironsi recognised some provinces, equal number in the north and south. The regions were not the same. We had extra region, mid-west. Out of four, one was north, three was south but we then developed a fair system of having six geo-political zones; three in the north and three in the south like it used to be, equality of units. Now, if we use the six geo-political zones as federating units that enables each unit to be big enough to take care of those needs of the people that are heavy and benefit from economies of scale, think about the past when we had the regions. There was ownership of regions and therefore, not too much corruption. If you squandered our money, we could literally kill you but today, Nigerian money is like nobody’s money and so people steal anyhow. There was also competition among the regions. Eastern Nigeria was very developed. Look at what Awolowo did in education in the West and it lasted up till today. Educationally, the west is still ahead, the foundation was laid by Awolowo. So, the issue of restructuring should not divide us. If the north is so sad about losing some majority institutions, the unfair number of states given to them, we can make some political amends by way of compensation, but not to go about the issue by telling outright lies that oil belongs to the north.

What about the Biafran agitation? What is your take on that?
I can say it many times because it is the truth; our people have some bottomlines, principles which guide their actions. One of them arises from this statement; life without honour is not worth living. The second is; he that is rejected does not reject himself. If you don’t feel accepted by your neighbours, what do you do? So, Biafra becomes inevitable when injustice is made permanent. People like me don’t even think of any division at all because I believe that nobody in his right mind would want Nigeria to break up and the people who seem to be pushing the break-up, the Fulanis, are the least well-placed if we were to break up because they would lose the most from a Nigeria that breaks up. The Igbos, somehow would manage to survive and thrive; the Yorubas are already surviving; South-South, God blessed them; Middle-belt, well, they might have problems, being the closest people to the Fulanis but the bottomline is that Nigeria is better off with the same people it has now and that there should be no break-up if we think about the long-term interests of each group. Let us look at the Igbos, they feel the most rejected at this stage. What is the problem? The problem is from God. God gave them social-culture, achievement orientation to succeed. The Igbo comes to a place empty-handed, he might even carry faeces on his head to make small money and gradually he gets a kiosk, eventually, he builds a palace in the place. Unfortunately, without knowing it, he would sit in front of his mighty palace and appear to ooze out more confidence than the original owners of the land. And, if the Igbo is from Anambra, he may even insult some people without knowing it when he is boasting. Therefore, jealousy would set in and from there to hatred, then the next thing is blood-flow. This is the problem we have in the country. But I am pleasantly surprised at Nigerians. In spite of what I have just explained, you find some people writing that Igbos are needed in Nigeria. I mean, these are people who can see. The truth is that Igbos are a gift God gave Nigeria. Look at anywhere you are talking about. Ijebu-Ode, go and count the houses. Go to Lagos and even in Abuja here or Kaduna, count the houses. Another Igbo principle is, where you live, you mend it. That is, you develop it, But we have over-done it and people are jealous of them and those who are jealous of them sometimes forget that they did not steal money and those who are Igbos forget that they can get a lot better by studying the people of the immediate environment, giving help and making friends with the local people.
The best thing is to restructure now; the earlier we restructure, the tighter the federation. The later we restructure, the more our federation would be more like a confederation. Those who are stealing money and dumping money in foreign banks come back here and talk nonsense about restructuring because they have so much money and they do not want anything that would bring money to other Nigerians.

Do you align yourself with those calling for the sale of some national assets?
Who will buy them? National assets are very heavy things. Only those who dumped our money in foreign banks can bring tiny bits of what they stole to buy our national assets. It is a matter of thinking about fairness. When you call the people who have stolen our money and you give them dash, who would compete with them? Let them sell the assets and you would find out who bought them and from where. You would find that it is not a fairly-spread participation. So, it is unjust to compound injustice and to give advantage to the more corrupt members of the society.

The House of Representatives has taken steps to establish state police. Do you see any merit or demerit in this?
What would make state police pass easily now? In fact, the 2014 national conference of which I was a member approved state police. Today, with the marauding cattle-rearers, everybody would call for a state police instead of the one that is controlled by the federal government and which closes its eyes as people are being killed; seeing somebody with AK47 tending to their cattle and are not asking questions. So, I think this time, we need it. In the beginning I was opposed to it. Many years ago when I was governor, I found that those who use the powers of governors can abuse state police. I said, for instance, a man is having dinner with his wife and men of the state police storm his house, abuse him and arrest him only on the excuse that the man is also aspiring to be the next governor. What that means is that if we allow state police, when it comes to aspiring to the office of the governor, the state police would behave so callously like what happened in the Edo election, like what INEC also did in that election. America said this own is another brand of democracy. The US Ambassador to Nigeria said what INEC was announcing was different from what were in the wards. The rigging was done at the collation centre.

How about plans by the federal government to establish grazing reserves and ranches for herdsmen?
They even said they would import grass and then, I don’t know if they will take over the cattle to sell to us or leave it to the individuals to sell to us. Grazing reserve is antiquarian. It is based on ancient practice where people must go about. There is a new technology for fodder production and this technology recycles fodder in just six days. So, you don’t need to move around and even when you want to move the cattle to the point of sale, you truck it down. How callous can our minds be? Are we decaying in the mind? You plant something, you come to look at your farm and you find cattle eating what you planted. You talk, they shoot you down. What kind of society are we running? So, the south as a whole declared against grazing reserve; I know because I chaired the meeting of the whole south (that is, Southern Nigeria Peoples Assembly) in Delta and it was a unanimous decision among southern people. I heard that the federal government proceeded to give money to some people to twist them but people have rejected grazing reserve. I don’t even support it being done in the north. Those people are also Nigerians and they have right to cultivate. In fact, we are eating more from the north than the north is eating from us. So, we should not allow the cattle to go and eat up the farm produce of the north. Government should encourage cattle ranching not grazing reserve.

The Buhari administration said it would not implement the report of the last national conference, describing the exercise as essentially a job for the boys. What is your view on this?
Well, as a member, I know what transpired there. Nigeria for once, working together made decisions. Not all the decisions were palatable to all sections of Nigeria but they were unanimous because you may not agree, but we would persuade you. For the first time, Nigerians met and took decisions by consensus.. So, if people who should know, people representing every group in Nigeria, that is the greatest achievement of that period and anybody who says he does not want it is only trying to play sectional game. If you are talking Nigeria, that (confab report) is the answer but if you are talking about sectionalism, well, you go ahead and do your own because you are in power. Imagine what happens when you are out of power. Or, are you insisting on the country breaking up?

The president made three major promises, anti-corruption fight, war against insurgency and job creation. How would you rate the government now?
You see the herdsmen marauding and killing and government is not concerned? You see, in Nigeria of 2016, you kill somebody and say the reason is blasphemy and the government does nothing. I must doff my heart for Ganduje, the governor of Kano State who said the right thing. Indeed, I am a Christian but what made me a Christian is because I arrived as a Christian. I did not choose to be. I was Christian on arrival because my parents were Christians. If you are from my village, town or local government, you are a Christian and even largely 99 per cent. If you are from Anambra, you are a Christian. So, it is not a matter of choice. Some of us were Muslims on arrival and some were pagans. We had no choice to make as per the circumstances of our birth. If there is blame, you go to God. But on our part, we only know how to praise God. So, no need blaming Buhari. It is not a matter of choice for him but it may be a matter of how much he knew.



Copyright LEADERSHIP.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from LEADERSHIP Nigeria Newspapers. Contact: editor@leadership.ng







Advertisement
Comments

Sign up for our newsletter

MOST POPULAR

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!