Reps Step Down Bill To Ban Unbranded, Unfortified Cooking Oils

The House of Representatives on Wednesday stepped down a bill seeking to prohibit the production, importation, distribution, sale and consumption of unbranded and unfortified edible oils following divergent views among lawmakers over its implications.

The proposed legislation, sponsored by Rep. Chike Okafor, who represents Ehime/Mbano/Ihitte Uboma/Obowo Federal Constituency of Imo State, was scheduled for second reading but was deferred after some lawmakers raised concerns, including complaints that copies of the bill had not been circulated to all members.

Leading the debate, Okafor said the bill was designed to address the public health risks associated with the widespread consumption of unbranded and unfortified cooking oils in Nigeria.

He said about 67 percent of Nigerians consume unbranded edible oils, while only 31 per cent of edible oils available in the country are fortified.

Citing the World Health Organisation (WHO), the lawmaker said food fortification is a proven and cost-effective strategy for addressing micronutrient deficiencies and improving public health.

Okafor explained that the bill seeks to prohibit the production, importation, distribution, and sale of unbranded and unfortified edible oils, while encouraging collaboration among research institutions, universities, and state ministries to improve seed varieties and establish cooking oil processing mills through public-private partnerships.

He added that the proposed legislation prescribes penalties, including prison terms for offenders, while providing a transition period for producers and marketers to comply with the new requirements.

“This is a matter of life and death. It is a call to protect the health of Nigerians,” he said.

However, some lawmakers opposed the bill, arguing that it could negatively affect thousands of small-scale palm oil producers and duplicate the responsibilities of existing regulatory agencies.

Rep. Paschal Agbodike, representing Ihiala Federal Constituency of Anambra State, warned that the legislation could threaten the livelihoods of rural communities that depend on local palm oil production.

“This bill is not okay. Many of my people are into the local production of palm oil. We must be careful about the laws we make because the livelihoods of people in rural areas are very important,” he said.

Rep. Gaza Gbefwi, representing Karu/Keffi/Kokona Federal Constituency of Nasarawa State, also opposed the bill, arguing that the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) already has the statutory responsibility to regulate edible oils and other food products.

“I do not think we need to over-legislate. Instead, we should strengthen existing laws and oversight. We already have NAFDAC and the Standards Organisation of Nigeria. If there are gaps in their enabling Acts, we can amend them,” he said.

Rep. Wale Raji, representing Epe Federal Constituency of Lagos State, shared a similar position, saying NAFDAC’s existing mandate already covers the objectives of the proposed legislation.

Supporting the bill, however, Rep. Sada Soli, representing Jibia/Kaita Federal Constituency of Katsina State, argued that the legislation would complement rather than duplicate existing regulatory efforts.

“The bill is mindful of NAFDAC. This legislation is trying to improve the existing framework and is not harmful. It is not against local palm oil production,” he said.

During the debate, Rep. Billy Osawaru, representing Orhionmwon/Uhunmwonde Federal Constituency of Edo State, noted that many lawmakers had yet to receive copies of the bill, making it difficult to make informed contributions.

In response, Okafor appealed to the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, who presided over the plenary, to step down the bill to allow wider circulation of copies and further consultations with stakeholders.

Kalu granted the request and deferred further consideration of the bill to a later legislative date.