The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has recovered 20 properties, 10 vehicles, and three princely wristwatches from two brothers, Olisaebuka Eze and Onyeka Nnadozie Eze, for a petitioner, Arthur Eze, through the Court of Appeal, Abuja.
EFCC spokesperson Dele Oyewale, in a statement, said in a final forfeiture ruling on Friday, June 7, 2024, by a three-person panel of justices, the Appeal Court, Abuja, dismissed the brothers’ appeal and affirmed the final forfeiture of the properties, vehicles, and other items to Arthur Eze, the nominal petitioner, as presented by the commission’s counsel, Ibrahim Buba.
The court held that the properties, all located in the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Abuja, were acquired with the proceeds of crime committed against Arthur Eze.
The properties and items which Justice Modupe Osho-Adebiyi of the FCT High Court, sitting in Gudu, Abuja, had in April 2022, ordered their final forfeiture to the petitioner include a seven-bedroom duplex at Plot 1772 Cadastral Zone B06, Mabushi District, FCT Abuja, located at No: 5 Ifeanyi Araraume Street Mabushi, Abuja; Plot No. 621, Cadastral Zone B07 within Katampe District with file No. JG 10188; nine units of two-bedroom flats located at Plot 375 off Ameyo Adadovah Way, in Kado District, Abuja; three-bedroom terrace duplex located at Brookhouse Residence Karsana District FCT, Abuja; Plot No. AHE540 in Lugbe AMAC Housing Estate measuring 1,500sqm; Plot No. 285, measuring 1,589.28sqm in Cadastral Zone E23 Kyami District Abuja; Plot No. R9530AA, measuring 1,000 sqm, located at Traders Layout 3 Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja; Plot No. R9530AA, measuring 1,000 sqm, is located at Traders Layout 3 Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja.
Other properties are Plot No. XK1057, measuring 800sqm, located in Apo Layout, AMAC FCT, Abuja; Plot of land with RofO with file No. AN 69550 dated 28/10/2012 at Kyami District Abuja; Plot No. 0844 in NAF Valley Estate, Asokoro Abuja, measuring about 1316.79; Plot No. 188 Cadastral Zone E 12 of Orozo, measuring 875sqm.
The items include a red Oulm wristwatch, stainless steel back Japan Move 3377; a golden-colour Just Bling wristwatch JB-6116; and a golden Piaget wristwatch with serial no. 8066-639333. The vehicles are a Toyota Camry 2014 2016 model, a Toyota Camry 2014 model, a Toyota Highlander, a Honda Accord 2013 model, a Mercedes Benz GLE 2015 model, and a Toyota Tundra with chassis No. STFRYF17EX171601 and a car spare key; Toyota Avalon with registration No. RSH111; Honda Civic with registration No. YAB58EN; Mercedes Benz C 400 with Reg. No. KWL43A5 and a Kia SUV.
Dissatisfied with the High Court order, the brothers approached the appellate court in separate appeals, praying that the order be set aside.
However, in the Appeal Court judgment read by Justice H.A. Barka, the appellate court held that the duo did not satisfactorily prove that they legitimately acquired the properties and all the items involved.
Justice Barka said the appellants did not “place any material before the court to enable it to disturb the lower court’s findings.” The court further held that the appeal lacked merit and dismissed it accordingly.
“The judgment of the lower court is affirmed,” Justice Barka stated.
We’ve got the edge. Get real-time reports, breaking scoops, and exclusive angles delivered straight to your phone. Don’t settle for stale news. Join LEADERSHIP NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates →
Join Our WhatsApp Channel
