ADC Demands Court’s Certified True Copies On Mark, Atiku’s Removal

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has demanded the immediate release of Justice Peter Lifu’s judgment, accusing the Federal High Court of refusing to release certified true copies of the ruling despite payment.

The party said Justice Lifu declared in open court that copies were ready, yet its counsel, who applied for the certified copy and paid the required fee, has still not received the judgment.

“This is an indefensible denial of access to a ruling that directly affects the party and its members. If the judgment was ready, there is no excuse for keeping it from the parties. Release it now,” the ADC said.

In a statement signed by Phrank Shaibu, Director of Strategic Communication, ADC Presidential Campaign Council, the party disclosed that counsel for the first defendant filed a formal application for the certified true copy on 6

November 2026 and paid the assessed fee, while counsel for the third defendant applied the day before, on the very day the judgment was delivered.

“Both applications carry the Federal High Court’s ‘PAID’ stamp. Every requirement was met. Yet the applicants are still being denied the judgment,” the party said.

The ADC insisted the development was not a routine administrative delay but a denial of access to a court decision that directly affects the rights of the parties.

“This is not a routine administrative delay. It is a denial of access to a court decision that directly affects the rights of the parties. Justice Lifu declared the judgment ready; the applicants paid for its certified copy; the court has acknowledged payment. Why, then, are they still being kept in the dark? A judge cannot announce that a judgment is ready and leave litigants to chase the document they need to understand and challenge it,” it said.

According to the party, the judgment concerns the leadership of a major political party and the rights of its members, and withholding its certified copy prevents the affected parties from knowing the exact orders made and responding fully through the courts.

“The judgment concerns the leadership of a major political party and the rights of its members. Withholding its certified copy prevents the affected parties from knowing the exact orders made and responding fully through the courts.
If the ruling is sound, there is no justification for keeping it out of reach. The Federal High Court must release the judgment immediately and explain why paid applications have gone unanswered. Public confidence cannot survive a process in which consequential judgments are announced, but their official records are denied to the parties,” it said.

The ADC recalled that it formally objected to Justice Lifu presiding over the matter, noting that National Secretary Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola raised serious concerns about the judge’s impartiality, citing previous appellate decisions that, in the party’s view, called his competence and neutrality into question.

“The ADC formally objected to Justice Lifu presiding over this matter. National Secretary Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola raised serious concerns about the judge’s impartiality, citing previous appellate decisions that, in the party’s view, called his competence and neutrality into question. Those concerns were placed on record. The unexplained withholding of the judgment now compounds them and demands answers,” it said.

The party also questioned the timing and conduct of the process, noting that Justice Lifu delivered the judgment days after the ADC launched its Sokoto campaign, declared the copies ready, yet the parties’ paid applications remain unanswered.

“The timing and conduct of this process are indefensible. Justice Lifu delivered the judgment days after the ADC launched its Sokoto campaign; he then declared the copies ready, yet the parties’ paid applications remain unanswered. The public is entitled to ask whether this was a judicial process — or a calculated attempt to deliver a political blow while denying the party the document needed to challenge it. Whoever believes that withholding the judgment will bury these questions or shield those responsible from scrutiny is gravely mistaken,” it said.

The ADC demanded the immediate release of the certified judgment and a public explanation for the delay.

“We demand the immediate release of the certified judgment and a public explanation for the delay. Every day it is withheld deepens the damage to confidence in the judiciary. Those responsible must understand that the ADC will pursue every lawful remedy, place the full record before the appropriate authorities and ensure that Nigerians know what has happened. No party, official or judicial officer is beyond scrutiny when the rights of citizens and the integrity of the electoral process are at stake,” it said.

“The ADC will not be intimidated or denied its right to challenge this ruling. Any attempt to obstruct that right will be met with every lawful action available, and those responsible will be held to account through the proper legal and institutional channels. Justice must be done, its record must be accessible, and the consequences of denying the parties that access must not be evaded,” it added.