Court To Deliver Judgement In EFCC Forfeiture Suit Against Malami On July 6

The Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed 6 July 2026, for judgment in the forfeiture suit filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against 57 properties linked to former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami.

The anti-graft agency is seeking the final forfeiture of the properties, alleging that they are reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.

A statement by the EFCC noted that Justice Joyce Abdulmalik fixed the date after counsel to the Commission, Jibrin Okutepa (SAN), and lawyers representing Malami and other respondents adopted their respective processes and presented arguments for and against the application.

Arguing the motion on Tuesday, EFCC counsel Jibrin Okutepa told the court that the application, filed in February, was backed by a 47-paragraph affidavit and 46 exhibits.

He described the motion as being contained in “three volumes” and urged the court to grant the reliefs sought by the commission.

A file photo of the Federal High Court Headquarters in Abuja.

Relying on the filed processes, Okutepa argued that Malami and the other respondents had failed to demonstrate that the properties were lawfully acquired sufficiently.

He urged the court to order the permanent forfeiture of the assets to the Federal Government.

Counsel to Malami and the other respondents, Adedayo Adedeji, opposed the application and asked the court to set aside the earlier interim forfeiture order.

The EFCC is prosecuting the defendants on an amended 16-count charge bordering on alleged conspiracy, procuring, disguising, concealing, and laundering proceeds of unlawful activities amounting to N8.71 billion.

Adedeji told the court that the respondents’ application, filed on 27 February and supported by a 109-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Malami himself, was intended to show cause why the final forfeiture request should not succeed.

According to him, the EFCC failed to provide concrete evidence linking the properties to criminal proceeds and merely relied on suspicion.

“The court deals with evidence, not suspicion,” Adedeji argued, urging the court to dismiss the commission’s application.

The defence further argued that the prosecution relied heavily on extrajudicial statements that would ordinarily require cross-examination in a criminal trial before they could be admitted as credible evidence.

The forfeiture proceedings are connected to an ongoing N8.7 billion money laundering trial involving Malami, his wife, Asabe Rakiya Bashir, and his son, Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami.

In January, Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court in Abuja granted the trio bail in the sum of N1.5 billion after they were arraigned on allegations bordering on money laundering.

The defendants had pleaded not guilty to the charges before being remanded in custody pending the court’s ruling on their bail applications.

Adedeji maintained that the matter could not be properly determined without oral testimony, noting that the court had earlier declined to admit oral evidence.

He also contended that several of the disputed properties were acquired before Abubakar Malami assumed office as Attorney-General of the Federation, insisting that they were not proceeds of crime.

The lawyer additionally moved separate counter-affidavits and further affidavits on behalf of other respondents and companies named in the suit, urging the court to refuse the final forfeiture request.

Other counsel representing individuals and corporate entities linked to the matter also asked the court to dismiss the application in the interest of justice.

After hearing all parties, Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the matter until 6 July for judgment.