Nigerian governors have expressed their support for the federal government’s tax reform bills.
The decision followed a meeting of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) and the Presidential Tax Reform Committee on Thursday.
The governors’ stance is a major boost for advocates of the bills that have caused much controversy in the country.
The bills before the National Assembly have caused a lot of division in the country, including even among the lawmakers.
However, even though the governors accepted the tax reform bills, they are proposing a new sharing formula for the value-added tax (VAT), an area that made northern governors and lawmakers reject the bills.
READ ALSO: Labour Wants Tax Bills Withdrawn
Governors under the aegis of the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) have unanimously opposed any increase in the Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate.
This stance was expressed in their communiqué after their high-level meeting with the Presidential Tax Reform Committee on Thursday in Abuja.
The governors emphasised the importance of maintaining economic stability and safeguarding the welfare of citizens during ongoing fiscal reforms.
In a significant move to address inequities in resource allocation, the forum suggested a revised VAT sharing formula: 50 percent based on equality, 30 percent based on derivation, and 20 percent based on population.
This formula aims to promote fairness and balance in resource distribution across the country, addressing the needs of smaller states while incentivizing revenue generation at the subnational level.
The NGF firmly opposed raising VAT rates, citing the potential impact on consumers and businesses.
The governors also advocated the continued exemption of essential goods and agricultural produce from VAT, emphasising the need to protect the most vulnerable and promote food security.
The forum endorsed the ongoing legislative process at the National Assembly to enact comprehensive Tax Reform Bills.
The governors also recommended the retention of development levies allocated to key national agencies, including the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND), National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI), and National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), without terminal clauses.
Chairman of the NGF and Kwara State governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq stated, “The Forum reiterated its strong support for the comprehensive reform of Nigeria’s archaic tax laws.
”Members acknowledged the importance of modernising the tax system to enhance fiscal stability and align with global best practices.
“Members agreed that to maintain economic stability, the VAT rate should not increase or Corporate Income Tax (CIT) should be reduced at this time.
ASUU Rejects Tax Reform Bill
The Yola Zone of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has rejected the proposed Nigeria Tax Bill (NTB) 2024, calling on the National Assembly to reject it equally.
The union’s Yola Zone said the bill would steadily reduce funding available to the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) from this year until it is completely depleted by 2030.
The zone, which comprises Adamawa State University (ADSU) Mubi, Modibbo Adama University (MAU) Yola, Federal University Gashua (FUGA), Taraba State University (TSU) Jalingo, University of Maiduguri (UNIMAID), and Yobe State University (YSU), Damaturu, said the bill would mark the end of TETFund and cripple tertiary education.
Dani Mamman, Zonal Coordinator, Yola Zone of ASUU, said it was unacceptable that the proposed controversial NTB 2024 seeks to dismantle TETFund by allocating only 50 per cent of the development levy to TETFund from 2025 to 2026, with the remaining half diverted to NITDA, NASENI and NELFUND.
“Replacing TETFund’s vital role with NELFUND so that by the year 2030 and beyond, TETFund will receive zero allocation from the development levy is unacceptable,” the ASUU Zonal leader said.
He added that TETFund had done so much to improve the infrastructure of universities and other tertiary institutions of learning that depriving it of funds may return such institutions to the bad state that informed their creation.
“Redirecting funds meant for TETFund to other agencies contradicts the TETFund Act 2011 and a gross misallocation of resources,” he stressed.
