• Hausa Edition
  • Podcast
  • Conferences
  • LeVogue Magazine
  • Business News
  • Print Advert Rates
  • Online Advert Rates
  • Contact Us
Tuesday, July 1, 2025
Leadership Newspapers
Read in Hausa
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Football
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Football
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Leadership Newspapers
No Result
View All Result

Reform Or Retreat: A Moment For Northern States

by Abdulrauf Aliyu
6 hours ago
in Backpage
Reform
Share on WhatsAppShare on FacebookShare on XTelegram

On June 26, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu assented to four landmark laws that signal the boldest reconfiguration of Nigeria’s fiscal architecture since the return to democracy. These are not technical tweaks or bureaucratic realignments – they are constitutional in their impact. The Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) Act, the Tax Administration (Standardization) Act, the Nigeria Tax (Consolidation) Act, and the Joint Revenue Board (JRB) Act together recast the very foundations of public finance in the federation.

Advertisement

These laws do not centralize power. They standardize trust. They do not take away from states. They challenge them to govern better. What they offer is both clarity and constraint: clarity about the roles and rules; constraint on informalism, discretion, and non-performance. And for Northern Nigeria, this package of reforms offers a sharp mirror. It reflects what has been neglected, and what must now be done.

The NRS Act establishes a central policy authority to define standards and coordinate compliance, without collecting a kobo of tax itself. The Tax Administration Act binds every IRS to transparent, digitized, and service-based practices. The Nigeria Tax Act simplifies and harmonizes the tax landscape, eliminating duplicative or conflicting levies. And the JRB Act turns the once-ceremonial joint board into a regulatory force capable of enforcing cross-jurisdictional audits, mediating disputes, and benchmarking performance.

This is not just administrative reform, it is institutional redesign. States are not losing autonomy. They are being required to earn it through capacity, discipline, and legitimacy.

 

RELATED

Fear And Fragility: How Safe Are Nigerians?

Fear And Fragility: How Safe Are Nigerians?

1 day ago
The Viper That Eats Fellow Snakes

The Viper That Eats Fellow Snakes

2 days ago

Between Law and Leadership: Reading the Terrain

The implications of these reforms are especially stark for Northern states. The region has long relied on federal transfers, not because of a lack of economic potential, but due to the institutional weaknesses in mobilizing domestic resources. Informality dominates. Trust in taxation is thin. Political will to modernize IRS structures has been uneven at best. These reforms now disrupt that inertia.

The most immediate impact is visibility. Under the JRB framework, IRS performance will be published. Compliance metrics, audit quality, process timelines, and incentive disclosures will be accessible to the public, donors, and potential investors. States will no longer compete on political narratives. They will compete on fiscal credibility.

The second impact is operational. Every IRS must now restructure around core functions: audit, enforcement, taxpayer services, risk management, and internal control. Most IRSs in the North are still organized by tax type, an outdated structure that fragments accountability and weakens reform logic. The law now demands integration, not improvisation.

Enforcement practices must also be reengineered. Coercive field tactics, informal demand notices, and opaque assessments are no longer tolerable. The law now requires service-oriented enforcement: digital notifications, clear redress mechanisms, taxpayer education, and time-bound dispute resolution. IRSs must now act as public institutions, not political extensions.

At the political level, reforms introduce transparency where discretion once reigned. Waivers and exemptions must be gazetted. Incentives must be rationalized. Patronage and rent-seeking can no longer be hidden behind policy ambiguity. This will be deeply uncomfortable for some political actors. But it is necessary. Governance requires exposure.

These laws raise the bar for leadership. State governors and commissioners can no longer rely on anecdotal performance. They must now show measurable outcomes. IRSs are being asked not just to collect taxes but to explain their systems, justify their procedures, and make their results visible. This new accountability framework will separate the performative from the truly reform-minded.

 

The Opportunity Beneath the Disruption

Despite the discomfort, these laws offer Northern states a rare opportunity for strategic reinvention. For IRS leaders, the reforms provide cover to restructure agencies, defend budget allocations for technology and training, and justify independence from political micro-management. What reformers once whispered, the law now demands.

Data interoperability, once elusive, is now achievable. With TIN linked to NIN and BVN, states can build unified taxpayer databases, connect them to land records, and create digital compliance maps. This is not about surveillance. It is about building the minimum infrastructure of trust, coverage, and equity.

Digital audit trails, standardized assessment logic, and public dashboards reduce discretion and increase citizen confidence. These are not just compliance tools, they are legitimacy devices. They allow taxpayers to see government not as an extractor, but as a service actor.

Public finance will become a reputation system. States that comply will attract investor attention, donor support, and citizen engagement. Those that resist will be isolated. The rules of engagement have changed. The old path is closed.

Communication must rise to the challenge. Reform cannot be broadcast in legalese. It must be narrated – through town hall meetings, religious platforms, market associations, and youth networks. Tax must be shown to fund public goods. IRSs must explain, not just demand. Leadership must frame taxation as a shared responsibility, not a burden.

This is not merely about messaging. It is about meaning-making. Institutions must co-author a new fiscal contract – grounded in fairness, clarity, and service delivery. Without this emotional logic, technical reforms will collapse under social resistance.

More critically, the reforms enable smarter targeting of underserved populations. With accurate taxpayer profiles, governments can offer proportional compliance frameworks, especially to informal and low-income earners. Taxation need not be regressive. It can, in fact, become a lever for inclusive governance when linked to tangible returns in service access, education, and infrastructure.

States that embed tax in a development narrative – one of growth, not punishment – will build resilience, legitimacy, and buy-in. Those that enforce blindly will erode whatever little trust remains.

 

Reform as a Political Signal

Reforms are not just operational events. They are political signals. They tell citizens what kind of leadership governs them. They tell markets whether a state is investible. They tell the federation whether a region is serious about statehood.

Northern governors must now decide whether their fiscal posture will be strategic or survivalist. Will they empower IRS boards? Will they consolidate registries for compliance intelligence? Will they fund reform units, not just hire consultants? Reform readiness is no longer a rhetorical virtue. It is a performance demand.

The danger now is not failure. It is delay. Half-implementation will be exposed. Quiet resistance will be visible. IRSs that stall will lose relevance. Political leaders who equivocate will lose reform legitimacy.

Donor behavior is shifting. Budget support, technical assistance, and subnational investment are all being tied to reform alignment. States that do not meet benchmarks will lose access—not as punishment, but as consequence. No institution is entitled to trust.

The tax laws are a forcing function. They force clarity. They force coordination. They force institutional learning. But they also offer a ladder. Northern states can use this moment to demonstrate what progressive federalism looks like – from Kano to Gombe to Sokoto.

What the tax laws create is a new social terrain, one where citizens expect fairness, institutions must justify power, and performance cannot be hidden. This is not just a fiscal transition. It is a governance inflection point.

The North now stands at a crossroads. One path leads to fiscal resilience, institutional maturity, and new legitimacy. The other path leads to further dependency, administrative decay, and reputational risk.

The question is no longer whether reform is possible. It is whether it will be owned.


We’ve got the edge. Get real-time reports, breaking scoops, and exclusive angles delivered straight to your phone. Don’t settle for stale news. Join LEADERSHIP NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates →

Join Our WhatsApp Channel

BREAKING NEWS: Nigerians can now earn US Dollars from the comfort of their homes with Ultra-Premium domains, acquire them for as low as $1700 and profit as much as $25,000. Click here to learn how you can earn US Dollars consistently.


Tags: Bola Ahmed Tinubu
SendShareTweetShare
Previous Post

Political Analysts To PDP Leaders: Fix Now Or Allow Crisis Sink Your Party Before 2027

Next Post

Akpabio Hails Anaba On Re-election As NGE President

Abdulrauf Aliyu

Abdulrauf Aliyu

You May Like

Fear And Fragility: How Safe Are Nigerians?
Backpage

Fear And Fragility: How Safe Are Nigerians?

2025/06/30
The Viper That Eats Fellow Snakes
Backpage

The Viper That Eats Fellow Snakes

2025/06/29
Sani And Erasing Rhythm Of Toxicity
Backpage

Sani And Erasing Rhythm Of Toxicity

2025/06/28
Israel-Iran
Backpage

Ruffled Feathers: Rejoinders To My Article On The Israel-Iran War

2025/06/27
Amid Dipping Revenue, Nigeria Must Modify Constituency Projects Scheme
Backpage

Amid Dipping Revenue, Nigeria Must Modify Constituency Projects Scheme

2025/06/26
Saints And Scoundrels – Honouring Nigeria’s Democracy On June 12, 2025
Backpage

Saints And Scoundrels – Honouring Nigeria’s Democracy On June 12, 2025

2025/06/25
Leadership Conference advertisement

LATEST

IDP’s Corpse Exhumed, Burnt To Ashes In Taraba

Sultan, Ihejirika To Grace NDA’s Course 18 Golden Anniversary

Wamakko Sponsors Free Eye Care For 5,000

Bauchi Man Jailed 1 Year For Stealing Water

Group Applauds Faleke For Fighting Insecurity In Kogi

2027: LPPMC Declares Support For Anti-APC Coalition

1 Dies In Kano Well Incident

Philanthropist Hails Tinubu On New Tax Law

Rotary Club Of Asokoro Unveils 2025/2026 Humanitarian Projects

AMWE Harps On FCT As Medical Tourism Hub

© 2025 Leadership Media Group - All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Football
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Leadership Media Group - All Rights Reserved.