Amidst uneasy calm in Kenya, one of its most controversial politicians, Deputy President William Ruto, will be in a strong position when he assumes the presidency, having received the approval of the electorate and the seal of the country’s highest court.
The Supreme Court upheld his victory in the 9th August, 2022 election, with a unanimous judgement that left no doubt that he defeated his main rival, Raila Odinga, in a free and fair contest.
The judgement is seen as a pointer that Kenya’s courts are independent, and will safeguard its democracy – just as they did in the last election in 2017 when they took the unprecedented decision to annul President Uhuru Kenyatta’s victory following a challenge by Odinga.
This time, the judges not only threw out Odinga’s case, but they chastised his legal team, saying the court had been sent on “a wild-goose chase”.
Political analyst Javas Bigambo told the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) that the legal process had boosted Kenya’s democracy and proved that “in the end it is the people who decide who their leaders are”.
Odinga will now be under pressure to congratulate Ruto on his victory. This would enhance his reputation as Kenya’s “Father of Democracy” rather than coming across as a bad loser.
But his defeat is a political tragedy for him – and his supporters.
Odinga was at the forefront of the campaign to end one-party rule in the 1990s, but he has never enjoyed the fruits of his struggle to become president, having lost in five elections.
In this, his story echoes that of his father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, Kenya’s first vice-president, who also failed to rise to the presidency despite the role he played in the campaign against British colonial rule.
Odinga’s supporters had hoped that the family’s contribution to the nation would finally be recognised with his elevation to the presidency in the 9 August election. The 77-year-old had previously said that this was his last stab at power.
“Fate has confined him in the same quarters that it confined his father. But he has no doubt contributed greatly to the improvement of the electoral process and cemented his significance in Kenya’s politics,” Bigambo told the BBC.
While Mr Odinga could argue that previous polls lacked legitimacy, he cannot do so with the 9 August poll, as Chief Justice Koome was emphatic – there was no evidence of the result being rigged in Mr Ruto’s favour.
She was also searing in her views on the four members of the election commission who disowned the result, pointing out that they had created unnecessary “drama” just before election commission chairman Wafula Chebukati announced the result.
“Are we to nullify the outcome of an election on the basis of a last-minute boardroom rupture whose details remain scanty?” the judges asked, adding that to annul the result would amount to upsetting the sovereign will of the people.
Bigambo said the judgement indicated that teamwork in the electoral body was important and infighting gave the commission a bad image.
The judgement will certainly be a huge relief for Mr Chebukati, who can proudly say that he delivered a successful election, and withstood pressure to not declare Mr Ruto the winner by 50.5 percent of the vote to Mr Odinga’s 48.8 percent.
In his speech after the judgement, Chebukati said it was a “testimony that the commission conducted a free, fair, transparent and credible election that met the democratic aspirations of the people of Kenya”.
Bigambo said the verdict “gives Mr Ruto more confidence to preside over the affairs of the country, legitimately and legally elected”.
Ruto had been magnanimous in his victory speech on 9 August, saying he will strive to unite the nation after a polarising election, but he also referred to a “deep state” that had tried to block him from ascending to the presidency.
