• Hausa Edition
  • Podcast
  • Conferences
  • LeVogue Magazine
  • Business News
  • Print Advert Rates
  • Online Advert Rates
  • Contact Us
Saturday, October 18, 2025
Leadership Newspapers
Read in Hausa
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
    • Football
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
    • Football
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Leadership Newspapers
No Result
View All Result

Court Nullifies IPOB Proscription, Awards N8bn Damages

by Nnamdi Mbawike
2 years ago
in Cover Stories
Court
Share on WhatsAppShare on FacebookShare on XTelegram

A High Court sitting in Enugu State and headed by Justice A. O. Onovo, has declared as unconstitutional the proscription and designation of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a terrorist organisation by the federal government and the South East governors.

Advertisement

The ruling followed a suit brought before the court by the IPOB legal team led by Aloy Ejimakor, challenging the 2017 proscription of IPOB as a terror organisation.

Justice Onovo, who delivered judgment in the suit marked E/20/2023, declared that “the practical application of the Terrorism Prevention Act and the executive or administrative action of the respondents (Southeast Governors Forum and the federal government) which directly led to the proscription of IPOB and its listing as a terrorist group”, was unconstitutional.

Advertisement

Reacting to the judgement,  Ejimakor said the court held that “IPOB being comprised of citizens of Nigeria of the Igbo and other Eastern Nigerian ethnic groups, professing the political opinion of self-determination and the consequent arrest, detention and prosecution of the applicant (Mazi Nnamdi Kanu) as a member/leader of the said IPOB is illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional and amounts to infringement on the applicant’s fundamental right not to be subjected to any disabilities or restrictions based on his ethnicity as enshrined and guaranteed under Section 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) and his fundamental rights as enshrined under Articles 2,3,19 &20 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (Enforcement and Ratification) Act.

“Today, I led a team of lawyers to a landmark victory before the High Court of Enugu State in Suit No: E/20/2023 filed in January 2023 against the Southeast Governors’ Forum and the FG (Respondents) for their collective executive actions (in 2017) that led to the proscription of IPOB and declaring it a terrorist group in contravention of section 42 of the Constitution which prohibits discrimination based on ethnicity.

“In a well-considered judgment that lasted for over three hours, the High Court (coram Justice A.O. Onovo) granted the following Reliefs: ‘that self-determination is not a crime and thus cannot be used as a basis to arrest, detain and prosecute the applicant, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

RELATED NEWS

New Electoral Chief Amupitan’s Credible Election Pledge Sparks Responses

Some Nigerian Pilots Fly While ‘High’ On Indian Hemp, Orji Kalu Alleges

Dangote Seeks Legal Backing For ‘Nigeria First’ Policy

Inflation Dropped To 18.02% On Improved Harvest, Forex Stability – Experts

“The court ordered the respondents, jointly or severally, to issue official letter(s) of apology to the applicant (Mazi Nnamdi Kanu) for the infringement of his said fundamental rights; and publication of said Letter(s) of Apology in three (3) national dailies.

“Ordered the respondents to, jointly or severally, pay the sum of N8 billion to the applicant (Kanu), being monetary damages claimed by the applicant against the respondents jointly and severally for the physical, mental, emotional, psychological, property and other damages suffered by the applicant as a result of the infringements of his fundamental rights by the respondents.”

Join Our WhatsApp Channel

SendShare10220Tweet6388Share

OTHER NEWS UPDATES

New Electoral Chief Amupitan’s Credible Election Pledge Sparks Responses
Cover Stories

New Electoral Chief Amupitan’s Credible Election Pledge Sparks Responses

23 hours ago
Nigeria Will Not Develop Until Igbos Are Treated Fairly — Orji Kalu
Cover Stories

Some Nigerian Pilots Fly While ‘High’ On Indian Hemp, Orji Kalu Alleges

24 hours ago
I Don’t Take This Award For Granted – Dangote, Person Of The Year 2024
Cover Stories

Dangote Seeks Legal Backing For ‘Nigeria First’ Policy

24 hours ago
Advertisement
Leadership join WhatsApp

LATEST UPDATE

Influencer Ola Of Lagos Denies Ownership Of Demolished Lekki Car Lot

1 hour ago

Gunmen Kill 2 Policemen In Kaduna Daring Attack

1 hour ago

Trump Speaks On Zelensky’s ‘Very Stylish’ Jacket During White House Meeting

2 hours ago

ASUU Strike: Senate Wades In, Meets Education Minister Tuesday

2 hours ago

Lagos Police Arrest 4 Notorious Armed Robbers Linked To Inter-States Car Theft

2 hours ago
Load More

© 2025 Leadership Media Group - All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
    • Football
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Leadership Media Group - All Rights Reserved.