• Hausa Edition
  • Podcast
  • Conferences
  • LeVogue Magazine
  • Business News
  • Print Advert Rates
  • Online Advert Rates
  • Contact Us
Sunday, August 3, 2025
Leadership Newspapers
Read in Hausa
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Football
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Football
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Leadership Newspapers
No Result
View All Result

Nigerian Courts’ Ambiguous Judgments

by Leadership News
2 seconds ago
in Editorial
nigerian courts
Share on WhatsAppShare on FacebookShare on XTelegram

Recently, a member of the House of Representatives, Hon. Clement Jimbo, called for greater clarity and consistency in judicial pronouncements across Nigeria, warning of an increasing trend of court judgments riddled with ambiguities—judgments open to multiple interpretations.

Advertisement

Citing the legal standoff between the Senate leadership and suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Jimbo argued that judgments must be simple, precise, and unambiguous, as anything less breeds confusion and undermines the rule of law.

He has given voice to the thoughts of every right-thinking Nigerian. This newspaper has watched, with dismay, the unfolding drama of Nigeria’s convoluted court rulings—judgments so ambiguous they inflame situations rather than calm them, and sow chaos instead of clarity.

Across the world, courts—whether constituted by a single judge or a panel—exist to resolve disputes, interpret the law, and enforce justice. As Aare Afe Babalola (SAN) once stated, the role of the judiciary in any society is to interpret laws, adjudicate disputes, and ensure the supremacy of the rule of law.

The judiciary is rightly called “the last hope of the common man,” a sacred pillar upon which the trust of the people rests. Its influence is far-reaching, shaping the political, social, economic, and even religious life of a nation.

RELATED

health

Breaking Down Barriers To End Nigeria’s Hepatitis Crisis

1 day ago
UK Trade Minister, Badenoch, Seeks Deeper Ties With Nigeria

Badenoch’s False Claim About Nigerian Citizenship

2 days ago

But when judgments emerge from these courts twisted, unclear, or susceptible to misrepresentation—causing confusion, even mayhem—then there is a serious problem.
What is baffling is that these judgments are delivered by Nigerian judges who live in Nigeria, understand the political climate, and yet seem unmoved by the misinterpretations and havoc their rulings trigger in the public space.

Do they issue these pronouncements and then drift into some judicial “space,” oblivious to the storm their words unleash on litigants, lawyers, and the society at large?

Consider the case of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. In March, the Senate suspended her for six months for allegedly breaching its standing rules. She challenged her suspension in court, and after a July 4 ruling, she announced plans to resume her seat. Yet, the Senate reaffirmed—three separate times—that there was no subsisting court order requiring her recall.Confusion reigns.

The same pattern of ambiguity trails judgments regarding the leadership crises in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Labour Party (LP). Rival factions, from Julius Abure to Senator Nenadi Usman, have each claimed victory after conflicting court orders, plunging the parties into chaos.

This is not new. Forum shopping—a practice where litigants hunt for courts willing to grant them ex parte motions—once compounded the confusion, until former Chief Justice Mohammed Tanko wielded the hammer, sanctioning judges who entertained frivolous orders. His decisive stance allowed conventions like those of the PDP and APC in 2022 to proceed smoothly, without judicial interference.
But those gains are eroding.

As Jimbo warned, the judiciary’s credibility is now at stake. When judgments lack the clarity required for enforcement—especially in politically sensitive cases—they fuel uncertainty, invite mischief, and risk heating up the polity.

This newspaper believes there is an urgent need to recalibrate how judgments are written and delivered in Nigeria. Judgments must not read like riddles; they must not leave room for endless interpretations.
When judges leave their rulings open-ended, they share the blame for the resulting confusion. When judgments are clear but misinterpreted, then lawyers must share that blame.

Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, must rise to this challenge. Under her watch, there must be renewed emphasis on judicial clarity.

We strongly suggest that courts should avoid excessive legal jargon that alienates the public and instead communicate in words everyone understands. Facts, issues, reasoning, and conclusions should be laid out in sequence. A reader should not struggle to find the “what,” “why,” and “how” of a ruling.Every question brought before the court should be explicitly resolved. This prevents partial interpretations of judgments.
Judgments should clearly cite statutes and cases that underpin decisions, grounding them in visible legal authority.Judgments must be easily obtainable by the public and professionals alike—preferably through well-organised court websites.Draft judgments could benefit from scrutiny by judicial peers to weed out ambiguities before they are finalised.

Needless to say ,Nigeria’s judiciary is the third arm of government—a vital guardian of democracy and economic stability. But that role is weakened when its judgments are treated like cryptic puzzles.

The courts must remember this: not every Nigerian is a lawyer. Their rulings must be written and delivered so that the average citizen, as well as the litigant and the lawyer, understands them without the need for elaborate decoding.

The stakes could not be higher. A judiciary that speaks clearly reinforces the rule of law. A judiciary that speaks in riddles erodes it.


We’ve got the edge. Get real-time reports, breaking scoops, and exclusive angles delivered straight to your phone. Don’t settle for stale news. Join LEADERSHIP NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates →

Join Our WhatsApp Channel




Tags: CourtCourt Judgement
SendShareTweetShare
Previous Post

Activists Clash With Police, Anti-Migrant Protesters In UK

Leadership News

Leadership News

You May Like

health
Editorial

Breaking Down Barriers To End Nigeria’s Hepatitis Crisis

2025/08/02
UK Trade Minister, Badenoch, Seeks Deeper Ties With Nigeria
Editorial

Badenoch’s False Claim About Nigerian Citizenship

2025/08/01
Groups Decry Coup Rumours, Urge Support For CDS
Editorial

Time To Rethink Our Border Security

2025/07/31
25 Years After Return To Civil Rule How Has Journalism Fared?
Editorial

Let Female Journalists Work In Peace

2025/07/30
Confusion As Courts Give Counter Orders On Kano Emirate
Editorial

The Kano Emirate Dispute

2025/07/29
WAFCON: Falcons Get $200k For Q/Final Qualification
Editorial

Super Falcons And The Meaning Of Glory

2025/07/28
Leadership Conference advertisement

LATEST

Nigerian Courts’ Ambiguous Judgments

Activists Clash With Police, Anti-Migrant Protesters In UK

Family Condemns Hamas Video Showing Emaciated Israeli Hostage

Experts Oppose One-Day 2027 Elections

Uncertainty Over NNPC CEO’s Alleged Resignation

Trump Fires Lead Official On Economic Data

Gov Sani Distributes 400 Trucks Of Fertilizer To Farmers

Women, Children Most Affected As Over 684 Lives Lost To Boat Mishaps Within 2 Years

PSC, Police Admission Spat: SANs Say Academy Must Get PSC Approval

2027: PDP, ADC Lobby May Put Obi In Dillemma– Political Scientists

© 2025 Leadership Media Group - All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Football
  • Others
    • LeVogue Magazine
    • Conferences
    • National Economy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Leadership Media Group - All Rights Reserved.