The All Progressives Congress (APC) has said it will be honest and open to a robust engagement in its campaign for the 2023 polls instead of mere propaganda.
National vice chairman (North-west) of the party, Mallam Salihu Moh Lukman, who stated this also described presidential candidate of the party, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, as more trustworthy than other major presidential candidates of opposition parties.
Lukman who spoke with journalists on Sunday also explained how the APC intended to campaign and convince Nigerians to vote it’s presidential candidate in 2023.
He said, “Life is about challenges. Those challenges exist, no doubt about it. But I think my response to it is that we will be honest, and we will open ourselves to engagement because democracy is a two-thing.
“Many of the deceptive propaganda being sponsored by opposition against APC is that the solution to the problem lies outside APC. Let nobody be deceived that APC is the problem. Yes, there are challenges that we are facing today which emerged while APC is in government. My pride is that our leaders are not in denial of those challenges unlike in the past. If you look at candidates of other parties, they are not coming up with recommendations, they are coming up with propaganda to shoot down APC and Nigerians should be smarter than that”.
The former director general of the Progressive Governors Forum (PGF) maintained that Tinubu is not an “election merchants” like the candidates of other notable opposition parties, just as he said the APC was ready to debate some of the issues with opposition parties when the 2023 campaigns begin.
He however stated that smfor APC to win in 2023, the party must review and look at what it promised Nigerians between 2015 and 2019, as well as the gaps that exist, and what needs to be done in order to address the gaps.
According to him, APC must prepare the campaign in such a way that there are answers to these challenges which Nigerians can see and can commit themselves to.
He noted, “I raised the point of the APC presidential candidate not being on the ballot since 2003 on a positive note, to demonstrate that he is not one of those I called election merchants. He wasn’t an election marchants. And he had every reason to have aspired in 2007, 2011, 2015 and 2019, but he didn’t aspire. He engaged in politics differently in a way that produced positive outcome in a different way. That cannot be said of the other candidates, whether Atiku Abubakar, Rabiu Kwankwaso or Peter Obi.
“I will not decend to the level of challenging their competence. They may be competent, but in terms of personal integrity and personal trustworthiness, our candidate is about the only one, together with the running mate, that have not changed their political party on account of aspiring to contest for election, which means they are people with some level of consciousness and integrity.
“And what that means is that trust can be invested in them more than people who when they don’t get what they want in a particular spot, they move to another place. Now for me, these are the issues to highlight. And we are ready to debate it as a party with anybody. Not the other issues about health challenges and what have you, or things that cannot be verified. These ones I mentioned, you can verify them. So, I think these are some of the points.”
On the competitive edge Tinubu has over other presidential candidates, Salihu said, “No doubt, Atiku, Kwankwaso, Peter Obi are respected people in politics. I will not toe the line of dismissing them. But like I said, in terms of edge and in terms of campaign, the advantage our candidate has is that he’s not a regular election merchant.
“The last time he appeared on the ballot was in 2003. Unlike the other candidates you mentioned, he has never left the party for any other party. Which for me means some higher level of integrity and trust worthiness.
“Now it is up to Nigerians to make their conclusion. Democracy is about making choices, but our business as a political party and political leaders is to promote our candidate and engage the competition in a way that people acknowledge and recognise their differences.
“When I talk of our candidate not being an election merchants, he also has another advantage. Je has been on the advocacy platform, even before democracy. The other candidates were not there.”
