NJC Recommends Compulsory Retirement Of Osun Judge

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended compulsory retirement of a high court judge in Osun State, Justice S.O. Falola, as it set up panels to investigate 51 petitions against others over various acts of misconduct in the discharge of their judicial duties.

The judge was recommended to Governor Ademola Adeleke for compulsory retirement for granting fraudulent orders against the provisions of the law.

At its 104th meeting held in Abuja, the Council invoked its Constitutional powers and placed the judge on indefinite suspension from duty pending the time Governor Adeleke would give effect to its recommendation.

NJC’s statement issued yesterday by its director of information, Barrister Soji Oye, indicated that Justice Falola incurred the wrath of the council when he granted a Garnishee Order Absolute against Polaris Bank for the sum of N283,174,000 in a questionable and strange manner.

The compulsory retirement recommendation was made sequel to the findings of an Investigative committee in a petition written against the judge by one Dapo Kolapo Olowo and Polaris Bank.

RELATED

BUK Appoints Professor Haruna Musa As New VC

1 hour ago

‘Let’s Walk From Airport To Port Harcourt And See’, Amaechi Challenges Wike To Popularity Contest

1 hour ago

Falola was also found wanting for attaching the account of the garnishee with another garnishee and not the account of the judgement debtor who had the legal obligation to pay the supposed judgement sum.

NJC found that the judge misconducted himself by entertaining suit No HIK/41/2018 when there was no evidence of a judgement of the Kwara State High Court before him, nor was there a Certificate of Registration of same in Osun State to confer jurisdiction on him.

It further found the conduct of the judge travelling to Lagos to visit the counsel of the bank in his chambers on the issue of garnishee proceedings unbecoming of the standard expected of a judicial officer.

Consequently, the council recommended him to Governor Adeleke for compulsory retirement with immediate effect.

Meanwhile, in the exercise of its disciplinary powers under the 1999 Constitution, the council also suspended Falola from office pending the approval of the recommendation of his compulsory retirement by the governor.

However, the council declined the request of Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke for permission to swear in the next most senior judge in the state in acting capacity following allegations levelled against Justice Adepele Ojo, Chief Judge of Osun State, and the resolution of the State House of Assembly to suspend him.

The council affirmed that Justice Ojo is still the recognised Chief Judge of Osun State and said it would not give credence to the resolution of a State House of Assembly, as it (NJC) is the only body constitutionally empowered to investigate judicial officers and recommend any necessary action to the governor.

Consequently, it ordered that Osun State should revert to the status quo.

At the meeting presided over by Chief Justice of Nigeria Olukayode Ariwoola, 11 probe panels were put in place to investigate 51 fresh petitions against other judicial officers for gross acts of misconduct.

The statement also revealed that the Council considered the reports of other Investigation Committees that had concluded their sittings, and dismissed petitions written against Justice Ekaete F. F. Obot, Chief Judge, Akwa Ibom State; Justice Benson Anya of High Court Abia State; Justice Z. B. Abubakar of Federal High Court; Justice Opufaa Ben-Whyte and Augusta Uche K. Chuku of the High Court of Rivers State, for being un-meritorious or withdrawal of petition by the Petitioners.

However, Hon Justice A. I. Akobi of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory is to be issued a letter of guidance to take proper charge and control of his court.

Similarly, the NJC resolved to report a Senior Advocate of Nigeria,  A. A. Aribisala, to the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC) for investigation and disciplinary action, for the unpalatable and derogatory remarks he made against a judicial officer and, by extension, the NJC in his petition to the council.