Our attention has been drawn to a publication by a group identifying itself as the “OBO Movement,” advancing the claim that the Senate seat for Cross River North Senatorial District should be exclusively reserved for Obudu, Bekwarra, and Obanliku Federal Constituency.
This position, in our considered view, is not only misleading but unsupported by any widely acknowledged historical arrangement, established consensus, or binding political agreement within the district. At best, it appears to be a narrowly defined interpretation driven by sectional interests rather than a reflection of the collective will of the people.
For the avoidance of doubt, the question of who represents Cross River North in the Senate is neither the preserve of any single bloc nor subject to unilateral claims. In a democratic setting, such decisions ultimately rest with the electorate, guided by fairness, inclusion, and the rule of law.
It is also important to note that key political actors frequently referenced in this conversation, including Senator Ben Ayade and Hon. Legor Idagbo, have previously held significant public offices across the state and at the federal level. Their records in office remain part of the public domain and, as with all public officials, are open to scrutiny and evaluation by the electorate.
Recent electoral outcomes across the senatorial district have equally demonstrated that voters are discerning and capable of making independent choices based on their assessment of performance, representation, and credibility. These outcomes, which are matters of public record, underscore the principle that political mandates are earned at the ballot box—not determined by claims of entitlement.
We therefore find it difficult to accept arguments that seek to restrict the democratic space or pre-determine outcomes through narratives that lack broad-based legitimacy. Any suggestion that zoning arrangements exist must be grounded in verifiable agreements endorsed by all relevant stakeholders, not assumptions or unilateral declarations.
Senator Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe, like every qualified Nigerian, retains the constitutional right to contest for elective office, as guaranteed under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and relevant electoral laws. That right cannot be abridged by political arguments that are not anchored in law or collective consensus.
We are also constrained to observe that the tone and content of the claims attributed to the OBO Movement reflect a pattern of political contestation that would be better served through open engagement with the electorate rather than through anonymous advocacy. Democratic competition thrives on visibility, accountability, and direct interaction with voters.
Senator Jarigbe continues to engage with stakeholders, party structures, and constituents across the senatorial district, with a focus on representation and grassroots connection. Ultimately, it is the people who will decide, as they have always done.
Our position remains clear: Cross River North belongs to all its people. No individual or group holds exclusive rights over its political future.
We therefore urge the public to approach such claims with caution and to remain guided by facts, democratic principles, and the rule of law.
In the end, the ballot—not rhetoric—will determine the outcome.
⸻
Signed:
Team Jari Media
We’ve got the edge. Get real-time reports, breaking scoops, and exclusive angles delivered straight to your phone. Don’t settle for stale news. Join LEADERSHIP NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates →
Join Our WhatsApp Channel






