Experts Call For Retaliatory Measures As US $20,000 Visa Bond Against Nigeria, Others Takes Effect Today

Nigerian experts in diplomacy and international affairs have called on the federal government to take retaliatory measures against the United States over what they described as “discriminatory and ridiculous” imposition of $20,000 visa bonds against Nigerian travelers and nationals of other African countries.

Effective Monday August 3, 2026,  United States intends to carry out its threat to compel Nigerians and other African business and tourist visa applicants to deposit up to $20,000 to guarantee they will depart America at the expiration of their stay.

This decision by the President Donald Trump administration was reportedly predicated on rising cases of visa overstays and poor information sharing by several countries on the continent.

The rule establishes a permanent Visa Bond Programme after the pilot phase that began in August 2025.

The US Department of State said the rule, which was published Saturday was intended to address the vexed issue of the hundreds of thousands of non-immigrant visitors who remain in the US beyond what was permitted.

According to the Department, the policy targets applicants from countries “with high overstay rates, deficient information sharing, insufficient identity verification and criminal records, and that need improvement in the area of screening and vetting and the security of travel and civil documents.”

The Department linked the policy to Executive Order 14159, “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” which directs the Treasury, State and Homeland Security departments to strengthen bond administration under US immigration law.

In a related development the US Embassy in Nigeria has admonished Nigerians not to use AI-edited passport photos for visa application, stressing that it will not accept photos that are edited or filtered.

“Your photo should be recent (taken within the past six months) and look like you. The TSA or CBP agent must be able to tell it’s you,” it said

Speaking to LEADERSHIP on Sunday, former Nigerian High Commissioner to Singapore, Ambassador Ogbole Ode,   said the decision was aimed to shut the doors against Nigerians and other Africans by an increasingly desperate US Government.

He advised the Nigerian government to activate the “principle of reciprocity” and impose severe measures as well on US visa applicants by imposing higher bond restrictions.

 Also speaking, public intellectual Dr. Katch Ononuju described the visa bond as “punitive and abnormal” stressing that it is discriminatory and might not work in the long run

 Dr. Ononuju also urged the Nigerian government to hit back at the US even as he advised Nigerians to remain calm.

International Constitutional Law expert, Livingstone Wechie, said the decision is an opportunity for Nigeria and other African countries to rethink their strategies towards the US and find a way to enhance their global relevance instead of relying on the US.

“The US has just told Africa to stand up and take their destiny in their own hands instead of seeking validation from the West. It is a window for Africa’s turnaround and to rise to its full potential by implementing the African Continental Free Trade Agreements (AfCFTA),” he said.

African countries affected include Algeria, Tunisia, Benin, Cabo Verde, Cote D’Ivoire, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal, Togo, Sao Tome and Principe.

Others include; Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Djibouti, Gabon, and Ethiopia, Tanzania, Uganda, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

The US has made the  visa restriction appear severe such that during the pilot phase, 50 countries were added and all qualified B-1/B-2 applicants were required to deposit as much as $15,000 as deemed necessary by the consular officers.

The State Department noted the pilot worked, saying that overstays from the affected countries dropped to fewer than 50 in the first 10 months of the pilot phase whereas in the full year 2024, the 50 pilot countries recorded 45,488 overstays.

The US authorities also explained that the bond would be refunded with no interest once US immigration systems confirm that the traveler departed on time and complied with all visa conditions, but it will be forfeited in cases of breach.

The State Department  noted that the bond requirement also led to a sharp drop in applications. It said further that visa issuance for pilot countries fell by 83 percent between August 2025 and July 2026, with close to half of the 20,000 applicants choosing not to pay the bond. Total bond payments during the pilot reached about $115 million, the State Department said.

US data showed non-VWP (Non-Visa Waiver Programme) countries consistently record higher overstay rates. For the full year 2024, the Department of Homeland Security reported 269,382 B-1/B-2 overstays excluding Mexico, Canada and Visa Waiver Program countries. For VWP countries, the overstay rate was 0.44 percent, compared to 2.06 percent for non-VWP travelers.

 “The 2025 visa bond pilot, which provided a framework for the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of the Treasury to assess the feasibility of administering a visa bond programme, has provided sufficient data to suggest that a visa bond program is an effective tool for enforcing compliance among bonded visa holders,” it said.

The State Department noted the policy is not punitive but a “tool of diplomacy” to push countries to improve data sharing and document security.

“This Programme responds to… and is intended to encourage foreign governments to take immediate action to reduce the overstay rates by encouraging their nationals to comply with US immigration laws,” the notice stated.

Under the new rules, consular officers will determine the bond amount to be paid by each applicant based on individual circumstances with the options set at $10,000, $15,000 and $20,000.

The decision, according to the Department, would be made during the visa interview after assessing factors such as purpose of travel, employment, income and ties to the applicant’s home country.