Court To Hear ABU, Ex-Workers Settlement Deal January 30

National Industrial Court sitting in Abuja has fixed January 30, 202,4 for further report of settlement in a suit filed by 110 former staff members of Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) against the institution.

Justice Rakiya Haastrup adjourned the matter after counsel for the claimants, Adegboyega Kolade, and the defendants’ lawyer, Abubakar Is’haq, agreed to await the computation format of the two federal government agencies involved.

The 110 ex-staff members are the claimants, ABU is the sole defendant in the suit.

Upon resumed hearing on Monday, Kolade informed the court that the claimants joined the defendant at a meeting as National Pension Commission (PENCOM) as instructed.

He craved the indulgence of the court for his colleague, Femi Adedeji, who was at the meeting, to brief the court on what transpired.

RELATED

Kidnappers Release Corpse Of Retired Army Major After N10m Ransom In Kogi

2 hours ago

Security Operatives Rescue 11 Kidnap Victims In Katsina

2 hours ago

Adedeji notified the court that during the meeting, both parties were properly guided on the position of the law regarding the pension and gratuity of the judgment creditors (110 former workers).

He said the parties also had a meeting with the Pension Transitional Arrangement Directorate (PTAD) on how their clients would be settled amicably.

The lawyer said he met with a learner friend of the judgment debtor (ABU) on how to implement the information obtained from these government agencies.

“I equally hinted to my learner friend on the need to submit to a third party like an arbitrator or referee because there may be information, we may not be able to resolve for them to find a balance for the two of us,” he said.

Adedeji prayed to the court for an order for the parties to submit themselves to arbitrators or referees who were experts in the field in accordance with Order 29 of the rules of the court, or alternative dispute resolution (ADR) of the court.

Corroborating Adedeji’s submission, Kolade said by virtue of Section 31 (a), (b) and (c) of National Industrial Court Act, 2006 and order 29 of the rules of the court, the judge had the power to appoint a referee or an arbitrator in agreement with parties.

“This is a situation where we need pension consultant to come in,” he said, insisting that there were grey areas the employer (ABU) was yet to comply with on contributory pension scheme since 2007 in accordance with pension act.

Kolade, who alleged that the ABU had not given them the format of its computation despite their request, said the institution planned to enforce its calculation on their clients but Is’haq denied the allegation.

Is’haq, said though parties met at PENCOM on Dec. 11 with representatives of the agency, he said the agency made it clear that it was its responsibility to calculate and compute all the entitlements of all those ex-workers who had crossed to Pension Reformed Act (PRA) 2004 with a definite day of June 2007.

He said they were told it was the duty of the employer to submit their records of service and they would take care of whatever they are duly entitled to while those who are under old pension act, PTAD would takes care of them. (NAN)